Micro Focus Email

Send E-mail

Self-Solve Knowledge Search

The Coda Version should better correlate to the OVO Agent version

The Coda Version should better correlate to the OVO Agent version

The Coda Version should better correlate to the OVO Agent version

The Coda Version should better correlate to the OVO Agent version
D-SL:100 HPSL:300 LIB4:false TYPE:reference HPTYPE:ENHANCEMENT_REQUEST ATT:0

A summary of your requested document is shown below. Please Sign In to access the complete document.

Summary

. An enhancement request has been received requesting that the version . number of the Embedded Performance Component (CODA) match the agent . version number or the PERF_INSTALLED_VERSION version number.. . Example:. . The Patch <a HREF="http://support.openview.hp.com/downloadKMDocument.jsp?hpswsource=DOCUMENTUM&hpswsourcedoctype=ER&legacyid=DOCUMENTUM_OVOW_00006">OVOW_00006</a> introduced the Windows Agent A.07.11 which . contained a CODA version of A.07.10.04. . Patch <a HREF="http://support.openview.hp.com/downloadKMDocument.jsp?hpswsource=DOCUMENTUM&hpswsourcedoctype=ER&legacyid=DOCUMENTUM_OVOW_00012">OVOW_00012</a> introduced Agent A.07.14 with CODA version A.07.10.06. . Patch <a HREF="http://support.openview.hp.com/downloadKMDocument.jsp?hpswsource=DOCUMENTUM&hpswsourcedoctype=ER&legacyid=DOCUMENTUM_OVOW_00030">OVOW_00030</a> introduced Agent A.07.20 with CODA version A.07.10.10. . In addition to this the PERF_INSTALLED_VERSION version number listed . in the opcinfo files does not match the CODA version number either.. . Example: . . <a HREF="http://support.openview.hp.com/downloadKMDocument.jsp?hpswsource=DOCUMENTUM&hpswsourcedoctype=ER&legacyid=DOCUMENTUM_OVOW_00030">OVOW_00030</a> patch has a PERF_INSTALLED_VERSION listed as A.07.15 and . yet CODA is reported as version A.07.10.10 via &quot;codautil -support&quot; . GBL_COLLECTOR.. . The Patch Text also does not indicate the Agent version number, the . PERF_INSTALLED_VERSION version number or the CODA version number . either.. . The enhancement request, requests that future patch texts and agents . should be consistent regarding their version numbers. An example can . be seen below:. . OVOW_00xxx Msg/Act Agent Patch A.07.58. -> OVOW Agent Version A.07.58. -> PERF_INSTALLED_VERSION A.07.58. -> Coda Version A.07.58.00. . If minor changes in CODA are made then these can be documented in the . digits after the major release.. . These changes should also be consistent with the OVO Unix platform . versioning.. . As the versioning of CODA is not in line with the versioning of the . OVO Agent version then this makes the patching process very confusing . for the customers and support..